Calgary
Herald, March
20th, 2010. Allowing gay men to serve as soldiers is ‘progressive’
policy. If you want a way to identify ‘progressive’ thought, ask yourself if
the thought is Western and destructive. If it is, chances are it is
‘progressive.’ Abortion is destructive; the ‘right to die’ is destructive; it
is destructive to have gay men for soldiers. ‘Progressive’ practice tends
toward death in one way or other.
Whatever side you happen to be on regarding the
Balkans conflict, ask yourself if that can be a good idea to have gay soldiers
standing on guard for you. Men who fantasize about fashion cannot be expected
to fight well! Men who dream about satin sheets cannot be expected to wield
their swords well! Men who are forever shopping for shoes cannot be expected to
slog in army boots! We all know this. But it is better, think the
‘progressives,’ to put lives in danger than to miss one step in the march
toward social ‘equality!’
Gay men are not equal to manly men. They are
effeminate, unmanly, and unfit for mannish duty. A man exhibiting female
character traits acts as if he’s in between genders. Or he seems to be a
compound of both. He’s like a rooster clucking instead of crowing. He can’t lay
eggs; but neither can he rule the roost. He is a hen-like rooster. If you throw
him into a cockfight to fight for you, do not be surprised when your side comes
out on the bloody, losing end.
Gay men should not serve openly in our militaries. They
should not serve in our militaries at all. They all seem to like papier-mache
and to know how to fashion something out of it. Maybe they could serve in some
artistic capacity. No, not even that. Just look at the stuff they turn out in
Milan for the catwalks there! And their requirements for the models who wear
their contrivances, how destructive are they?! The anorexic lifestyle is
largely due to gay fashion designers who insist that their models look like
prepubescent boys. Gay fantasyland is a dark, destructive place.
It is not difficult to spot a gay man, usually. In
harder to determine cases, the deviant proclivity will betray itself to
observation before long. You might find him in a ‘compromising’ situation with
another man, which is what ‘outed’ a gay man when I was in the service. Gay men
should be found out and kicked out, for their own safety as well as for
everyone else’s.
The Bible does not condemn homosexuality without
reason. It is destructive one-on-one, for unnatural practices lead to personal
injuries. And it is destructive to society, whether we believe the opinion of
General Sheehan or not. AIDS would not have taken so many lives if
homosexuality had never been practiced. This is an irrefutable fact. Listen to
the Bible. As much as people hate to have this verse quoted, yet listen to the
command again: “Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is
abomination” (Leviticus 18.22.) We cannot expect blessing when what is
abominable to God is sanctioned by us.
You who call yourselves Christians or
evangelicals but who defend gay ‘rights,’ listen up. Does God hate something
and then love something? Does he hate sin and then love it? Is God not the same
today as he was yesterday, just like the Bible says? God’s moral policies are
never changing. If you think God changeable, you have no reason to be sure that
he will love you forever. In fact, you have no reason to believe that you have
received his unconditional love, for this changeable god that you have faith in
cannot be the true God. The reason why men are not consumed is said to be on
the ground of God’s unchanging nature. “For I am the LORD, I change not;
therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed” (Malachi 3.6.) Do you suppose to
be in the covenant so long as you deny the ground that upholds it? A changing
god cannot be dependable. And the unchanging God will consume you unless you
hold that he is immutable. Search out the rules of a covenant; be not with one
of your own design. It you are a Christian who is tempted to be popular instead
of controversial by siding with the gay agenda, Malachi has a message for you.
“Return unto me, and I will return unto you, saith the LORD of hosts” (3.7.)
You rob God of his nature by holding that he embraces what he once abominated.
You rob him of his immutability. If you do that, you are a devourer. God is
into rebuking devourers (3.11.)
No comments:
Post a Comment