Red
Deer Advocate, April
10th, 2010. ‘Paternal care’ is Vatican-speak for keeping a molester
priest ‘out of trouble,’ this article says further down. Would that ‘trouble’
he should be kept out of be molesting, or getting caught molesting? When
soldiers were in the field, and were granted a nite out in some new town, the
whispered rule was, ‘Have fun, just cover your tracks.’ Molesting children was
not our game, though. Kiesle was sentenced in 1978 for “tying up and molesting
two young boys in a San Francisco Bay area church rectory.” In 1981 “Ratzinger
was appointed to head the Vatican office that shared responsibility for
disciplining abusive priests.” A few years after that, Kiesle “continued to do
volunteer work with children through the church.” He was allowed to do this by
that order from Ratzinger (who could have defrocked him but wouldn’t) for
‘paternal care’ to be provided Kiesle.
This is who Pope Benedict is: former
Cardinal Ratzinger who resisted defrocking a molester priest, which resistance
is called ‘paternal care,’ which order affords the molester continued access to
vulnerable children! Changing your name can’t change your heart, Ratzinger.
Those of us who know what popes are made of know very well what you are about.
Your white dress does not imbue your soul with virtue; your Latin speech will
not sanctify your orders. Jesus has this written rule: “He that is not with me
is against me” (Luke 11.23.) Making use of this in a practical way concerning
Ratzinger’s ‘paternal care,’ we come up with: ‘He that resists defrocking a
pedophile priest must be for molesting.’
Do not be dazzled by the pope’s pomp: his pope-mobile,
his jewel-filled Vatican, or his highest sacerdotal hat. The man is just Joseph
Ratzinger, a rascally bad man! The reputation of his corrupt Church means more
to him than the safety of innocent children. Compare this to Jesus Christ, the
Person the pope falsely believes to be his Master. Did Jesus elevate corrupt
religious institutions above virtue? About the bejeweled but corrupted temple
in Jerusalem, he prophesied, “As for these things which ye behold, the days
will come, in the which there shall not be left one stone upon another, that
shall not be thrown down” (Luke 21.6.) Will the pope prophesy the same about
Rome? Does Ratzinger draw children all around to confer blessings on them like
Jesus did? Or does he not permit them to be swarmed by carnal priests?
“It is impossible but that offences will
come: but woe unto him, through whom they come!” (Luke 17.1.) Woe to Ratzinger,
then, for through him molesting priests do come at little children. “It were
better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he be cast into
the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones” (verse 2.) Jesus
Christ, the Judge of all the earth, will avenge every child hurt by the
hierarchy of Rome. You staunch members of Roman Catholicism, if you can’t serve
both God and Mammon together, be sure that you cannot serve Jesus and the pope
together. You do not serve Jesus by serving the pope. The pope does not imitate
Jesus, nor can he, for he has not ‘the mind of Christ’ (1 Corinthians 2.16)
with which to do it. To care more for pedophile priests than those molested by
them is to be ‘carnally minded’ (Romans 8.6.) Take the Bible, not popedom, for
your religion. Consider your eternal welfare.
No comments:
Post a Comment